Back to Bizweek
SEARCH AND PRESS ENTER
Latest News

“Singapore is the most preferred jurisdiction for arbitration and mediation”

Farid Karachiwala, Partner, JSA Advocates and Solicitors, India
Farid Karachiwala, Partner, JSA Advocates and Solicitors, India

“If you are transacting with a party for several years and happen to go to court at some stage, that relationship gets disrupted. In mediation, there is a possibility that you may not disrupt that relationship, and you might also consider settling it by giving in for a little more or a little less,” Farid Karachiwala, Chair of the disputes practice at Indian law firm JSA, states in an interview with BIZWEEK. Speaking at the ADR Symposium held in Mauritius, which witnessed insightful discussions on the relevance of Alternative Dispute Resolution (ADR) in contemporary legal practices, Farid Karachiwala emphasized the significance of exploring new avenues in dispute resolution, particularly through mediation. 

How pertinent and relevant was it for you to attend this ADR Symposium in Mauritius?

I was invited to speak on the panel on mediation law, and I am the chair of the disputes practice of a very large law firm called JSA (Editor’s note: in India). It was very interesting for me to speak on mediation because I have recently handled quite a number of mediations, and I am very focused and excited about the new ways that mediation could end disputes. I like to attend these conferences and speak about the values and how mediation could be used as a way of resolving disputes.

 

Why should we favour mediation when there are courts of law?

You go to mediation for two reasons essentially. The first one is that you save time, while the courts will take much longer. Secondly, you will save on costs because the time spent is less in mediation. Now, when you go to court, you are in a situation where you are fighting with your counterparty. Sometimes, business relations end because of the fight. In mediation, you are exploring the possibility of settling your differences. It’s not a dispute. This is very important in mediation. If you are transacting with a party for several years and happen to go to court at some stage, that relationship gets disrupted. In mediation, there is a possibility that you may not disrupt that relationship, and you might also consider settling it by giving in for a little more or a little less. This is the advantage.

 

How is the mediation landscape in India? 

We have a new law on mediation, which has been recently enacted in September 2023. It was anticipated that the United Nations Convention, which is popularly known as the Singapore Convention, and which was framed by the United Nations General Assembly in 2019, would be ratified by the Indian government. This was with respect to international mediations, but what India did was an enactment on domestic mediation. The international mediation is hence not yet effective. We have a law on mediation in India, and we are hopeful that at some point in time, we will also have the ratification of the Singapore Convention, where India would have legislation in place similar to that of Singapore.

We are hopeful that at some point in time, we will also have the ratification of the Singapore Convention, where India would have legislation in place similar to that of Singapore.

Singapore, a reputable centre, is close to you. In what way could Mauritius be interesting to Indians as an arbitration centre?

Businesses in India who choose arbitration shifted from London to Singapore for three reasons. The first one is the time and the cost. London is far for Indians, compared to Singapore. Secondly, we have the effective mediation laws in Singapore. The enforceability of awards which are passed by the Singapore International Arbitration Centre (SIAC) is confirmed by the Singapore Arbitration Court, and then directly executed in our country. We hence have a system which is not only faster and cost efficient, but there is also enforcement on an expedited basis, without the usual hassle and trouble.

 

What is your assessment of Mauritius as an arbitration jurisdiction?

I’ll be frank with you. I have never heard of any party who looks at arbitration in Mauritius. The two jurisdictions that Indian businesses look at when they deal with cross-border parties and transaction are Dubai, because it’s also close, and Singapore.

Dubai was considered as an interesting arbitration jurisdiction at first because they were affiliated to the LCIA (London Court of International Arbitration). DIFC (Dubai International Financial Centre) has however been abolished, and DIAC (Dubai International Arbitration Centre) has now come in. The problem with DIAC is that you will need to actually get it enforced by filing a proceeding in the Sharia Court before it can be enforceable. So, Dubai has taken a little bit of a backseat.

Singapore is the most preferred jurisdiction. The Singapore Arbitration Centre awards are given the stamp of approval of the Singapore Arbitration Court.

There’s a dispute which is currently going on between two big giants, Zee TV and Sony. Sony was supposed to acquire Zee TV. The dispute is before the SIAC in Singapore. The current biggest dispute in terms of contractual issues is before the Singapore jurisdiction because of the faith, the time and the enforcement process.

I don’t have any experience in referring or doing arbitrations or mediations in Mauritius, but I’m sure that if the system is there, Indian business houses could look at Mauritius as an alternate. This is what this conference in Mauritius is all about: how IORA countries can have a more effective way of enforcing contractual obligations through ADR or mediation.

 

Is this your first time here, in Mauritius?

 It’s my first time here.

 

What would you bring back to India from this experience? 

On a personal level, I just love the country. It’s so beautiful. The moment I could see it from below the clouds, it was completely green and the topography is amazing. The weather is very good, and the people very warm. The Air Quality Index is very good. Yours is four, ours is 400. We are living in a factory back home. These are the takeaways as far as my personal experience is concerned.

Coming back to the conference, I’ve been listening to a lot of panellists, and I think it’s a great platform where people from the IORA states are exchanging their views.

IORA can be a very successful platform because it is 23 countries. When 23 countries join together and try and do something, their voice is going to be heard by the whole world. This is very interesting. India, by itself, may or may not be able to do it, but India being a part of IORA is very meaningful.

The current biggest dispute (between Zee TV and Sony) in terms of contractual issues is before the Singapore jurisdiction because of the trust, the time and the enforcement process.

Skip to content